EVERYTHING YOU EVER WANTED TO KNOW
ABOUT THE HEALTH CARE BILL NOW BEING
CONSIDERED IN WASHINGTON
PLEASE Sign the “Free Our Health Care Now” Petition
http://freeourhealthcarenow.com/
…and please send it to all your family and friends to sign
Let Washington know THIS IS NOT WHAT AMERICA WANTS!!
It does not reflect the values of the American people.
Fix Health Care Policy
A Project of the Heritage Foundation
This is a great website for all current information.
http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/
7-30-09
Obamacare: One Pill, Two Pill, Red Pill, Blue Pill
Top 10 Reasons Obamacare Is Wrong for America
http://www.heritage.org/Press/FactSheet/fs0036.cfm
Health Scare
7-14-09
Video
Must-see expose of Socialized Healthcare in Canada.
This video was made by 20-somethings Steven Crowder and his friends with some humor.
Watch any five minutes of it and you’ll want to pass around to friends, but don’t stop there!
Send this to your kids if they’re old enough, because understanding that everything good can’t be free takes some time, and we may not have that time at the rate the Left is pushing toward single payer.
WATCH THE VIDEO:
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2009/07/13/must-see-undercover-expose-of-socialized-healthcare/
FACT: Obama voted against every Republican attempt at
improving Health Care during his time as a Senator
7-25-09
Video
YOU MUST WATCH THIS … This is a really great, comprehensive discussion on the Health Care debate. Panel includes Betsey McCaughey, former NY Lietenant Governor and Health Care expert plus others who have studied the issues at length. If you don’t have time to read massive amounts of material in order to understand the issues of the debate, just sit back and WATCH THIS …
Health Care Causality? What you’re not being told …
Betsey McCaughey, Paul Gigot + WSJ Editorial panel
Published: Sat, 25 Jul 2009
Description: How senior citizens would suffer under government overhaul
http://www.foxnews.com/search-results/m/25473089/health-care-causality.htm
7-25-09
Video
Doctor resigns from AMA over health care reform bill
http://www.foxnews.com/search-results/m/25470764/protest-vote.htm
Video
Key Democrats speak candidly about plans for healthcare reform
Their Goal Is a Single Payer-Health Care System
The Obama administration is pitching government-run health care to cover 46 million uninsured Americans, despite opposition from the American Medical Association, Republicans and even some members of his own party.
The president may give you the headline, but to understand what this plan is really about, you need to listen carefully to what those on the left are saying.
Please understand, the public insurance option will put employer-based, private insurance out of business and the government can bide its time — taking losses — until that finally happens. Here’s proof that this is their goal:
VIDEO
http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.html?playerId=011008&streamingFormat=FLASH&referralObject=6020772&referralPlaylistId=playlist
Video
7-27-09
Single Payer Government Health Care is Democratic Goal
Barney Frank lets us know that the Democrats’ goal is single payer, but it will have to be done incrementally – first step is the Public Option.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3BS4C9el98
Video
7-23-09
How Would Healthcare Bill Affect Catholic Hospitals
Catholic hospitals do not perform abortions,and if the governments plan is passed they would be forced to perform them.No federal funding for abortions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS45dGmn06E
Video
7-27-09
“Freedom of Choice Act” Means Goodbye to Catholic Hospitals
A new version of FOCA, however, is back. As reported by Fox News contributor Father Jonathan Morris, FOCA, like a mutating virus, has been newly re-packaged and is just as insidious. Father Morris, interviewed on Sunday Morning’s program Fox and Friends, described the main difference between the old bill and the new one: The new version of FOCA now mandates that, if passed, abortion coverage must be paid for by taxpayers, regardless of what their personal stand may be on abortion. This new version of FOCA is the proverbial wolf in sheep’s clothing.
http://newsrealblog.com/2009/07/27/fox-news-freedom-of-choice-act-means-goodbye-to-catholic-hospitals/
7-22-09
The Devil in the details of Obama healthcare
An end to all Catholic hospitals and facilities?
An adept rhetorician and politician, Obama has marginalized the U.S. Catholic bishops in the debate over healthcare. What is coming are pressures on Catholic hospitals to violate their principles regarding abortion. Massachusetts leads the way.
http://www.speroforum.com/a/19925/The-Devil-in-the-details-of-Obama-healthcare
7-24-09
GovernmentCare’s Assault on Seniors
Since Medicare was established in 1965, access to care has enabled older Americans to avoid becoming disabled and to travel and live independently instead of languishing in nursing homes. But legislation now being rushed through Congress—H.R. 3200 and the Senate Health Committee Bill—will reduce access to care, pressure the elderly to end their lives prematurely, and doom baby boomers to painful later years. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203517304574303903498159292.html
7-31-09
How House Bill Runs Over Grandma
Rationing: In the recesses of the House health care “reform” bill is a provision
for end-of-life counseling for seniors. Don’t worry, granny, they’re from the
government and they’re here to help.
http://ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=333933006516877
7-30-09
Inside Obama Healthcare
Americans may or may not have a chance to review the 1,000 pages of the health care bill
now considered by the House of Representatives. Among its troubling provisions are
“end of life” issues.
http://www.speroforum.com/a/19988/Inside-Obama-Healthcare
7-24-09
GOP Rep. Compares Obama Picking A Puppy & Health Care Reform
DON’T RUSH HEALTH CARE BILL!!
At least take as much time as you took to pick a puppy!!!
Republican [Although CNN Misidentifies Him As A Democrat] Congressman Nathan Deal Of Georgia Compares Obama Picking A Puppy & Health Care Reform – 07/24/09
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwpIzdANs7A
7-16-09
Mayo Clinic’s reaction to House Tri-Committee bill
“The real losers will be the citizens of the United States.”
In general, the proposals under discussion are not patient focused or results oriented.
http://healthpolicyblog.mayoclinic.org/2009/07/16/mayo-clinic%E2%80%99s-reaction-to-house-tri-committee-bill/
7-22-09
Mayo Clinic Health Policy Center – Health Care Blog
Open Letter to Congress
Mayo Clinic, along with 18 other health care organizations around the country, sent an open letter to Congress on July 22.
http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthpolicycenter/pdfs/open-letter-to-congress-7-22-09.pdf
In addition, on July 19, 2009 the Chicago Tribune published “Bending the Curve on Health Spending” authored by Denis Cortese, M.D., and MD, President & CEO, Mayo Clinic and Jeff Korsmo.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-oped0719mayojul19,0,2771064.story
This is absolutely a must read …
7-24-09
DEADLY DOCTORS
Savings, he writes, will require changing how doctors think about their patients: Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, “as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others” (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008).
Yes, that’s what patients want their doctors to do. But Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else.
He (Emanuel) explicitly defends discrimination against older patients: “Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years” (Lancet, Jan. 31).
Dr. David Blumenthal, another key Obama adviser, agrees. He recommends slowing medical innovation to control health spending.
Blumenthal has long advocated government health-spending controls, though he concedes they’re “associated with longer waits” and “reduced availability of new and expensive treatments and devices” (New England Journal of Medicine, March 8, 2001). But he calls it “debatable” whether the timely care Americans get is worth the cost.
Obama appointed Blumenthal as national coordinator of health-information technology, a job that involves making sure doctors obey electronically deivered guidelines about what care the government deems appropriate and cost effective.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07242009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/deadly_doctors_180941.htm
4-29-09
The Attack On Doctors’ Hippocratic Oath
In critiquing the Hippocratic Oath, Dr. Emanuel calls for training medical students “to move toward more socially sustainable, cost-effective care.”
President Obama has appointed impressively educated advisers. But no matter how many degrees they have, it’s still important to examine what they think. The views articulated by Drs. Emanuel and Blumenthal are contrary to American values.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=325900812716750
7-26-09
Abortion unleashed in Obama healthcare
The current health care bill will expand abortion more than anything since the Roe v. Wade decision by the Supreme Court. It will offer no freedom and little choice.
http://www.speroforum.com/a/19954/Abortion-unleashed-in-Obama-healthcare
7-21-09
Don’t Be Fooled by Obama’s ‘45 Million’ Uninsured
TAKE A CLOSER LOOK: When the numbers are crunched, it turns out that only 11 million legal American citizens who would like health insurance don’t have it, and even that figure is likely high. If we take it at 11 million, that’s less than 4% of the country.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/07/21/se-cupp-obama-healthcare/
7-21-09
House Dem Health Plan Contains Words of Coercion — not Choice
… the bill is really about empowering bureaucracy and limiting freedom, competition, and the marketplace,” said NTUF Director of Congressional Analysis Jeff Dircksen.
… the words “choice,” “options,” and “freedom” appear just 85 times in the mammoth 1,018-page legislation, while three restrictive words — “require,” “limit,” and “must” (and variations) — were nine times more prevalent.
http://www.ntu.org/main/press.php?PressID=1108&org_name=NTUF
7-29-09
Analyzing Obama’s Health Care Rhetoric
I … looked for the same words as our earlier analysis (of the HC Bill).
What a shocker! Obama’s rhetoric utilizes positive words more than 5.5 times as often as the negative ones. That’s a complete reversal of what the Democrats’ legislation actually says.
http://blog.ntu.org/main/post.php?post_id=4799
7-9-09
Obama Can’t Be Trusted With Numbers
So Why Should WE Trust Him with Health Care?
Mr. Obama has already created a river of red ink. His health-care plans will only force that river over its banks. We are at the cusp of a crucial political debate, and Mr. Obama’s words on fiscal matters are untrustworthy. His promised savings are a mirage. His proposals to reshape the economy are alarming. And his unwillingness to be forthright with his numbers reveals that he knows his plans would terrify many Americans.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124709502661214861.html
7-21-09
Racial Preferences in the Democrats’ Health Care Bill
… The bill includes racial preferences. Under the Democrats’ health care bill, if a medical school wants to increase its chances of receiving many different kinds of grants and contracts from the federal government, it should have a demonstrated record of training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups. This is because the Democrats’ health care bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to give preference to the entities that have demonstrated such a record in the awarding of these contracts to medical schools and other institutions.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/racial_preferences_in_the_demo_1.html
7-19-09
Obama Health Plan to Cover 12 Million Illegals
On Friday, Democrats moved one step closer to giving free health insurance to the nation’s estimated 12 million illegal aliens when they successfully defeated a Republican-backed amendment, offered by Rep. Dean Heller, R-Nev., that would have prevented illegal aliens from receiving government-subsidized health care under the proposed plan backed by House Democrats and President Barack Obama …
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/health_care_obama/2009/07/19/237484.html
6-26-09
Unions To Get Dues from ObamaCare
“Is it any surprise that unions are one of the greatest contributors to the Democratic party and that they are now exempt from one of the most controversial taxes he (Obama) is considering,” he asked. “It’s not illegal, but gosh, does it look bad.”
http://townhall.com/columnists/JillianBandes/2009/06/26/unions_to_get_dues_from_obamacare
7-15-09
It’s Not an Option
From the beginning, opponents of the public option plan have warned that if the government gets into the business of offering subsidized health insurance coverage, the private insurance market will wither. Drawn by a public option that will be 30% to 40% cheaper than their current premiums because taxpayers will be funding it, employers will gladly scrap their private plans and go with Washington’s coverage.
What wasn’t known until now is that the bill itself will kill the market for private individual coverage by not letting any new policies be written after the public option becomes law.
The legislation is also likely to finish off health savings accounts, a goal that Democrats have had for years. They want to crush that alternative because nothing gives individuals more control over their medical care, and the government less, than HSAs.
The public option won’t be an option for many, but rather a mandate for buying government care. A free people should be outraged at this advance of soft tyranny.
Washington does not have the constitutional or moral authority to outlaw private markets in which parties voluntarily participate. It shouldn’t be killing business opportunities, or limiting choices, or legislating major changes in Americans’ lives.
It took just 16 pages of reading to find this naked attempt by the political powers to increase their reach. It’s scary to think how many more breaches of liberty we’ll come across in the final 1,002.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332548165656854
7-24-09
Community-Organized Crime
Throughout both Health Care Bills, references are made to things that will be executed by “community organizations.” They are referring to ACORN and its 350-plus organizations under its umbrella.
This organization is now under investigation – can you imagine what they could do with the trillions of dollars from our health care industry and how much damage they could do to our health care system?
“Operationally, ACORN is a shell game played in 120 cities, 43 states and the District of Columbia through a complex structure designed to conceal illegal activities, to use taxpayer and tax-exempt dollars for partisan political purposes, and to distract investigators,” the report says. Structurally, it is “a chess game in which senior management is shielded from accountability by multiple layers of volunteers and compensated employees who serve as pawns to take the fall for every bad act.”
http://spectator.org/archives/2009/07/24/community-organized-crime
Another reason President Obama is pushing national healthcare legislation: It’s all about EXPANDING UNIONS and “community organizations” like ACORN into another 17% of the economy.
KEEP READING:
6-17-09
Back to ACORN General Hospital
“What’s this?” I asked. “It’s for the union.” I handed it to her. “You don’t understand. I am an RN. A professional. I won’t be joining a union.” She handed the card back to me. “No, you don’t understand. This is a closed shop. Fill out the card.”
… my brief stint as a union nurse was over. Until now. Because as I look over Obama’s healthcare plan, and the AFSCME and SEIU websites, it’s obvious that the service employees unions are all over Obama’s health care “reform.”
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/back_to_acorn_general_hospital.html
12-15-08
Welcome to ACORN General Hospital
I’ve been a registered nurse for 30 years, so the future of American health care is one of my greatest concerns.
Nowhere … is there any hint of taking care of sick people. Community organizing meets health care.
And what did Michelle accomplish as a hospital Vice President? According to her resume: She grew a staff of two into a diverse, 23-person team that carries out a threefold mission of improving community-based health care, increasing business opportunity of South Side businesses and enhancing the Medical Center’s considerable service to the surrounding community.
So her first accomplishment was increasing the size of her own department eleven-fold! Forget the use of the word “diverse”. The sheer amount of expenditure involved in a 23-person department with a Director earning over 300K is breathtaking!
The last thing 9,200 Medical Center employees want to do after a tough week is to spend a day “reflecting” with Michelle and her diverse staff. And because, at the moment, the nurse works for the hospital and not for (the) federal government, she has the freedom to say “No thanks.”
The problem is that health care workers aren’t college students. Forced “service learning hours” aren’t part of the job description, and if one hospital tells me that taking part in Michelle’s “Adopt-A-School” program is part of my contract, I’ll head over to the hospital down the road. And I’ll deck the first limousine liberal who tells me that health care workers need to be forced to help their communities.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/12/welcome_to_acorn_general_hospi.html
7-17-09
O’s Broken Promises
One troubling provision of the House bill compels seniors to submit to a counseling session every five years (and more often if they become sick or go into a nursing home) about alternatives for end-of-life care (House bill, p. 425-430). The sessions cover highly sensitive matters such as whether to receive antibiotics and “the use of artificially administered nutrition and hydration.” … This mandate invites abuse, and seniors could easily be pushed to refuse care. Do we really want government involved in such deeply personal issues?
The most recent ABC News/Washington Post poll (June 21) finds that 83 percent of Americans are very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the quality of their health care, and 81 percent are similarly satisfied with their health insurance.
Congress should pursue less radical ways to cover the uninsured. We have too much to lose with this legislation.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07172009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/os_broken_promises_179667.htm
6-24-09
How Health Care Reforms Will Mess With Your Coverage
But for patients, there’s a bigger danger: a mandate that will limit your choice of health plans and restrict when you can see a specialist. You may be compelled to pay 10% or more of your income for insurance you don’t want.
Let me address a few big questions you may have …
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/06/24/2009-06-24_how_health_care_reforms_will_mess_with_your_coverage.html
6-26-09
The Dangers of “Fannie Mae Health Care”
A public plan would have certain advantages. That’s precisely the problem.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124597297859757163.html
6-30-09
A ‘Fix’ We’ll Likely Regret – George Will
Most Americans do want different health care: They want 2009 medicine at 1960 prices. Americans spent much less on health care in 1960 (5 percent of GDP as opposed to 18 percent now). They also spent much less — nothing, in fact — on computers, cell phones and cable and satellite television.
Your next car can cost less if you forgo GPS, satellite radio, antilock brakes, power steering, power windows and air conditioning. You can shop for such a car at your local Studebaker, Hudson, Nash, Packard and DeSoto dealers.
http://townhall.com/Common/PrintPage.aspx?g=f8f064a0-64cc-46d1-9d84-0fbac4e48d2f&t=c
5-29-09
When the Right to Die Becomes a Duty
Wagner, a great-grandmother and retired bus driver living in a low-income apartment, could not afford the drug herself. So she asked her state-run health insurance plan for help.
The response she received shocked her. Oregon state officials sent a letter saying that they would not pay for medication to extend her life, but they would foot the drug bill for an assisted suicide — an expenditure of roughly $50.
Assisted-suicide laws like the one in Wagner’s state are a potential boon to tight-fisted insurers and bureaucrats looking to cut health care costs. And the growing acceptance of assisted suicide and euthanasia, even in states that do not explicitly permit them, makes it easier for frustrated physicians and caregivers to convince themselves and others that severely ill and disabled patients would be better off dead.
http://www.eppc.org/publications/pubID.3838/pub_detail.asp
7-27-09
Health Bill Boils Down to August Battle
The president and his allies hope that the profusion of new progressive groups, which have organized under the rubric of “Unity ‘09” and which coordinate closely with one another and with the White House, will be enough to quell citizens’ concerns about the bill, to keep members in line, and to fuel a sense of outrage at the status quo. It’s a fight those groups have been preparing for since the inauguration.
“What we have is a strong, practiced field infrastructure, which is gearing up because they now understand the stakes,” MoveOn’s Hogue said of the progressive movement. “In the August recess, we are going to see the full force of that pressure brought to bear on those who are on the wrong side of history, and an unrelenting chorus of voices calling for the undecideds to move on health care reform, a clean energy economy and the other urgent priorities of the American people.”
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25419.html
7-19-09
How Bad Is Obama Healthcare?
If passed, it will reduce the quality and increase the cost of health care in America. But more importantly, it will severely undermine our already weak economy….
http://www.lewrockwell.com/schiff/schiff35.1.html
7-24-09
Emanuel: House will vote on Health Care next week …
The House of Representatives does plan to vote on health legislation before leaving for its August recess, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel told NPR.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106946745
7-23-09
Perry raises possibility of states’ rights showdown with White House over healthcare …
Texas Gov. Rick Perry … suggested Thursday that he would consider invoking states’ rights protections under the 10th Amendment to resist the president’s healthcare plan, which he said would be “disastrous” for Texas.
http://www.star-telegram.com/804/story/1504240.html
7-23-09
Physicians and health care professionals might like to see this.
The “Comments” section to the piece are just as good …
Healthcare Policy, Social Justice and Thugs
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/healthcare_policy_social_justi.html
4-29-09
The Attack On Doctors’ Hippocratic Oath
In critiquing the Hippocratic Oath, Dr. Emanuel calls for training medical students “to move toward more socially sustainable, cost-effective care.”
President Obama has appointed impressively educated advisers. But no matter how many degrees they have, it’s still important to examine what they think. The views articulated by Drs. Emanuel and Blumenthal are contrary to American values.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=325900812716750
7-20-09
Obama and the CPUSA
And their overwhelming approval of Obama’s agenda
(Communist Party of the United States)
(1) Obama’s policy agenda and that of the CPUSA are in perfect alignment: more stimuli; green jobs; global warming; public sector jobs; more regulation and, in fact, restructuring of the entire economy; eventual single-payer health care, with the public option being critical to any immediate plan; union-friendly legislation; cutting defense spending; engaging and normalizing relations with the US’s mortal enemies like Hugo Chavez, the Castro brothers and the reigning mullah’s of Iran; claiming victory in Iraq as their own.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/07/obama_and_the_cpusa.html
First Do No Harm
Problem solved: More Doctors = more competition.
The poor and the aged already have socialized medicine. Changing the method of payment for the rest of the population will have little substantive effect other than to introduce economies of scale offset by bureaucratic gigantisms.
http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1618/article_detail.asp
The New New Deal
… Obama’s mission was to save not capitalism but the welfare state. He trusted the market more than FDR did, because it had proved over many decades its ability to generate a surplus that could be redistributed to the poor (a relative term, of course), and because it had made many Democrats with educations and careers like his quite rich. But Obama realized that the entitlement state’s spiraling costs would eventually prove unsustainable. Audaciously, he decided to double down: to declare health care a right and move toward universal coverage under an increasingly nationalized system. He bet that this will force higher taxes and, at the same time, give him and his successors greater control over costs.
… To the Democrats it’s always 1932. They think Americans should believe in a depression even when they don’t see one. The paralysis of the financial markets and the plummet in stocks were real enough, to be sure, but Obama’s agenda for nationalized health care, draconian environmental taxation and regulation, and the steady expansion of government (except for national defense) was already in place long before the economy tanked. It was in the Democratic Party platform, under H for Hope. Now it’s marketed under F for Fear—without these urgent new initiatives, we are warned, the American economy will never recover.
http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.1612/article_detail.asp